Long term perf trends comparing ActiveRecord to Sequel. https://rubybench.org/rails/rails/commits?result_type=activerecord/postgres_scope_all&display_count=500&compare_with=sequel/postgres_scope_all … , AR 5.5x slower in this bench. Thanks heaps @bmarkons
This benchmark inserts `nil` for the timestamps when using Sequel. These are not benchmarking the same thing
-
-
we got to fix that then ... let me have a quick look
-
Surprised you would ever accept a 5x difference to be true here TBH. Both of these are going to be dominated by IO
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.