The third example is literally Swift, right?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @withoutboats
The period is in front, not in back. Ironically it's seen as implicit there b/c you're writing `.Some(foo)` and not `Option.Some(foo)`
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @withoutboats
Yeah actually now that I think about it, the Swift version is more implicit in most cases. You never need to specify the enum name
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sgrif @withoutboats
An interesting example of an optimization throwing away the opportunity for a better one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gankra_ @withoutboats
Rust could have in theory done the same as swift but without the dot. Only time it's ambiguous is nullary const with the same name
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sgrif @withoutboats
Rather: nullary variant where a const with the same name is in scope
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I don't suppose you have a link to when it changed? Would be interested in the reasoning
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.