Uhreally? What part of Unicode can't be expressed in non (NUL-terminated UTF-8)?
"Text is always UTF-8 encoded and NUL-terminated." These cannot both be true. Unless you only want to support a subset of unicode
-
-
-
A nul byte is a valid Unicode character.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/platform/serialization/spec/protocol.html#a8299 … For object serialization, Java uses a superset of UTF-8 where literal U+0000 is overbyte-encoded as c0 80
pic.twitter.com/pDGEPiJha7
-
Not quite: Java uses a modified version of CESU-8 (with U+0000 encoded as described). CESU-8 is approximately a byte-encoding of UTF-16.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Even though that's technically true, in real use cases how many times have you needed support for U+0000 in your strings?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.