I have a really visceral negative reaction to named field puns. It is frustrating to not be able to properly articulate my revulsion.
-
it does feel like a violation of some kind of... separation of... something. However Bar { foo: foo, baz: baz } *is* lame...
I don't feel strongly about it but I do feel strongly that there should be parity with pattern syntax
-
-
I think this is a false equivalence - you can't use .. _ ref @ when initialising a struct either (well, you can use .. 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but it has completely different semantics. Also, binding and using variables are so completely different operations 2/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.