which Carrier does too, no?
-
e.g. match thing { Ok(x) => x; Err(error) => return Err(error) }
Yes, that's exactly what `try!` does (with an `into` call on the error in case there's conversion)
-
-
Yeah, thinking about it I guess you don't have enough primitive inversion of control to do that for a future.
-
Exactly. Can only be represented by nesting in `and_then` which is what do notation would do
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.