Striking thing: ratio of green to red. For Rust RFCs, I think it's reversed. What could account for the difference?https://twitter.com/jtbandes/status/753509110629343232 …
-
-
Replying to @glaebhoerl
swift is newer to the "open development" there are still good ideas out there ;p
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ManishEarth @glaebhoerl
OTOH all the low hanging fruit in rust is gone and ideas need much more thought put into them
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth
Don't think the ratio was much greener pre-1.0. Was it? It does seem like most of the Swift rfcs are smallbore "obvious" tweaks
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @glaebhoerl @ManishEarth
I would hypothesize their pre-submission process/culture is probably different. Maybe they already do what Rust's planning to?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @glaebhoerl @ManishEarth
gankra's gay Retweeted Joe Groff
gankra's gay added,
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
(Swift follows the Emacs versioning model where the leading '0.' is implied)
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
So the breakage can be quite... Swift? (I'll see myself out)
-
-
♫ It's better to burn out, 'cause Rust never sleeps
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.