Did not realize that 0 * Infinity is NaN. Anyone know why that wouldn't be expected to be 0?
-
except I now learn that 0 == -0 but 1/0 != 1/-0. I guess the moral of the story is that is floating point math isn't math.
(And as a software maintainer, the world is better when you can find that choices were explicit and made with intention)
-
-
yeah, all of these choices are "that seems reasonable given the constraints" rather than "that is bad and you should feel bad."
-
Yeah, I think the only choice that could fall into the latter is looking at all of this and deciding you don't need integers
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.