-
-
Replying to @olivierlacan
@sgrif@schneems Best guess is https://trello.com/c/nzhMlstw/55-give-gems-rb-and-gems-locked-higher-priority-than-the-gemfile-counterparts … ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @olivierlacan
@olivierlacan@sgrif@schneems more context https://github.com/bundler/bundler/commit/0823e10ea01d36f6bdb764cc8754bda7236737e9 …1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @olivierlacan
@olivierlacan@sgrif@schneems I think I would not break it ever.. Gemfile is a thing for a LONG time already.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthurnn
@arthurnn@olivierlacan@schneems Agreed. Naming things is important. Avoiding breakage is more important.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @olivierlacan
@sgrif@arthurnn@schneems Can’t argue to@indirect that Bundler team should maintain something deprecated for ever. But yeah, 2.0 is scary.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @olivierlacan
@olivierlacan@sgrif@arthurnn@indirect i think i miss-spoke actually. Sorry. New gemfile.lock format is 2.0. I don't know about the name2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneems
@schneems@olivierlacan@sgrif@arthurnn gems.rb and gems.locked is better, but 2.0 plans to support both without deprecation
2 replies 3 retweets 7 likes
@indirect @schneems @olivierlacan @arthurnn Thanks for clarifying, André!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.