what if we all just stopped saying `Monad` and started saying `Bindable`?
-
@sgrif I was arguing that using an *able name might help people grok the concept, vs vague math terms that might be “more correct”.
-
-
@sgrif Maybe. I used bind because I’m used to haskell. You could call it `FlatMappable` if you prefer, although that might be equally opaque -
@GFontenot I agree, unless you've used flat_map in another language, that's not really helpful either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.