-
-
Replying to @jessitron
@jessitron@sgrif that's a feature, not a bug. If any part of a computation is potentially asynchronous, it all is.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @philwills
@philwills@jessitron Not disagreeing. But that also tends to mean it needs to happen at the language level, and we all have to agree2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
@sgrif@jessitron true. Having such a type in the core libraries makes things much easier.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @philwills
@philwills @jessitron I don't see it fully happening in Ruby any time soon, since the original statement can be generalized to any monad.
11:20 AM - 5 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.