Why should your religious beliefs give you the right to know or care about your employees' genitals or what they do with them?https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1272921975682457607 …
-
And then it seems like the go to answer would be genitals. So are trans folks who have had bottom surgery fine in that case? And it comes back to my original point that employers do not otherwise get to know about folks genitals
If you're claiming that there's a religious exemption to not employing someone for being gay, isn't that implying that sex as in intercourse is considered socially relevant public information as well?
-
-
To be clear, the main point I'm trying to make is that even if you ignore societal changes, claiming there should be a religious exemption here still seems ridiculous to me as it implies you should have a right to know details that no other employer does
-
I agree that a special religious exemption doesn't make sense; the appeal would be to a principle of freedom of association. (LGBT folx probably prefer not to work for conservative Christians, anyway! And that's an important right!)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.