Why should your religious beliefs give you the right to know or care about your employees' genitals or what they do with them?https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1272921975682457607 …
-
What determines biological sex though? Chromosomes have been understood for less than a century, so using them as a baseline for conservative Christians doesn't really make sense (esp if the argument is that they don't change with culture).
And then it seems like the go to answer would be genitals. So are trans folks who have had bottom surgery fine in that case? And it comes back to my original point that employers do not otherwise get to know about folks genitals
-
-
If you're claiming that there's a religious exemption to not employing someone for being gay, isn't that implying that sex as in intercourse is considered socially relevant public information as well?
-
To be clear, the main point I'm trying to make is that even if you ignore societal changes, claiming there should be a religious exemption here still seems ridiculous to me as it implies you should have a right to know details that no other employer does
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.