this whole thread has me like *distressed crab noises*https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1256640034054135808 …
Show this thread
-
Rust analyzer does it with... around 80% success for me. It often can't figure out the type. That will get better, of course, but I don't think it's trivial and IIUC there are some parts of it (macros) that make it unreasonably difficult -- those cases might never work well.
And there are cases where naming the type just isn't possible or isn't helpful. And I don't think those cases are going to go away. My point is that if it's not clear what the capabilities of a variable are from the code, that's a failure of the code that was written
-
-
Forcing the name of the type to be written is almost never the best way to solve that problem
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.