"this" == that coins work differently than bills
-
-
Replying to @sgrif
even Normal Coins are not debt, though. coins are different. yes, the decisionmaking process is a bit more complex than what i'm laying out, but the properties of the coinage are the same
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth
You're right that coins aren't debt, but that's because the Mint doesn't report to the federal reserve, the report to the secretary of treasury. The only time coins go through the fed is to fund the mint itself. The secretary of treasury cannot increase the coins in circulation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ManishEarth @sgrif
Seems like the treasury can mint coins whenever it wants? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5111 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth
"As needed to meet the needs of the united states" isn't the same as "whenever it wants". It means at the discretion of congress, to fund itself, or to replace coins taken out of circulation. If you look at section 5112 there's a special provision for commemorative coins
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sgrif @ManishEarth
You can also reverse this logic -- if they could just mint any coins whenever they want they wouldn't have looked at using the trillion dollar commemorative coin loophole to work around the debt ceiling
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
well, it's "in amounts the secretary decides are necessary" I read 5112, it doesn't seem like (k) provides additional discretion over the general one given by 5111 (a)?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth @sgrif
my impression was that it would just cost too much to do this with "normal coins"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth @sgrif
but icbw, i'm not a lawyer, could be that the practical effect is that 5111(a) means "congress needs to authorize it" but 5112(k) bypasses it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That all depends on if you think a judge will side with you on whether your decision actually fits "to meet the needs of the united states"
-
-
Replying to @sgrif
yeah fair. what my reading of that was that 5111(a) applies to everything in 5112, so the needs thing also applies to 5112(k)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ManishEarth
I think the best way to make the point is to reverse the reasoning here again. If that were true they would just use bills
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.