Is there anyone still actively working on helping Windows user install Ruby & Rails without using WSL? It seems like RailsInstaller for Windows stalled at Ruby 2.3 which reached end of life last year. Ruby 2.4 looks like it never made it out of beta. Is WSL the way to go?
-
Show this thread
-
@shanselman seems to think WSL2 is a great way to run Rails on Windows which feels encouraging. https://www.hanselman.com/blog/RubyOnRailsOnWindowsIsNotJustPossibleItsFabulousUsingWSL2AndVSCode.aspx … WSL sure seems a lot less hacky than RailsInstaller ever was.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @olivierlacan @shanselman
I think the biggest benefit here, especially for newer devs, is that they don't need to find "what is the Windows version of x". Things like rbenv or chruby are just what you use. There's a lot of docs on how to use various gems on Linux that applies to WSL
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sgrif @olivierlacan
Our goal is for a Windows dev to show up on some site and see some instructions that say "open terminal, you'll see $ now type..." and not be excluded.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @shanselman @sgrif
Seems like people (*cough*,
@samsaffron) are saying WSL2 is worth it for serious Ruby development on Windows but there are major issues hindering adoption: the need for an experimental Windows build, networking quirks, differences in file locations, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You don't need an experimental Windows build, that's outdated info
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sgrif @olivierlacan and
Miss Dada 🏳️⚧️ Retweeted Miss Dada 🏳️⚧️
Roughly 1 week in, all of my issues are hardware (read keyboard layout) related, the terminal emulator not being iterm2, or https://twitter.com/sgrif/status/1230583628435845121 …. I may run into the issues you mentioned above, but I haven't yet.
Miss Dada 🏳️⚧️ added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Are you using wsltty, that is the only great terminal at the moment, the microsoft terminal though fast and promising is just missing too many features at the moment like mouse support.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, I'm using windows terminal. I just noticed the lack of mouse support today (which isn't something I frequently look for). At the moment my biggest gripes are the lack of clicking on urls/files to open, and that pasting multiline is funky. I'll try wsltty
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Scott Hanselman Retweeted Scott Hanselman
Scott Hanselman added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
\o/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.