hot take: `=>` is the least obvious syntax in all of haskell
-
-
in scala, they don't say: `where A: Ord<B>` instead, they say: `[B >: A](implicit cmp: Ordering[B])` and i think that's beautiful.
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
(implicit $ev0: CanBuildFrom[B, F[_]])(implicit $ev1: F[_] <:< F)(implicit $ev2: MakeFOps[F <% B])
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
this is violence
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
implicitly[$ev1 >%> F].do { import $ev3.MakeFOps[F[_]] }
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
this is not real scala but it COULD be
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Hey kids wanna try some haskell instead (yes this is valid) fix$(<$>)<$>(:)<*>((<$>((:[])<$>))(=<<)<$>(*)<$>(*2))$1
5 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
-
Replying to @hdevalence @mgattozzi and
Does that mean now you're the compiler and michael is the memer? Huge if true.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hdevalence @yaahc_ and
"" (huge is ub)
7:33 PM - 10 Feb 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.