-
we've already "rebalanced" coherence once lol
1.41 stabilized a change to the coherence rules from an RFC I wrote a year or two back called re-rebalancing coherence (which was named because it loosens rules originating in an RFC called rebalancing coherence)
-
-
oh yeah I forgot we rerebalanced it too third time's the charm
-
Oh no, things are fine, nothing unsound, just annoying that it's like "you can't impl this as one trait for result<t, e> and e because result could impl error in the future.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.