So are folks going to continue arguing that the person who *barely* landed in 4th place (and may very well be in 5th when all precincts are reporting) is the most "electable"?
-
-
Or fix your electoral system so folks can vote for whomever they want _as well as_ the most 'electable' candidate:https://www.electionscience.org/library/approval-voting/ …
-
You first
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.