Miss Dada  🏳️‍⚧️

Right, but the Planck constant isn't something you can independently measure. The kg is now defined by giving it an exact value

But that argument also applies to the speed of light doesn't it? Can't measure how fast something is without a distance. I think the phrase 'base' at this point mainly means they're the units to use when doing dimensional analysis and not some kind of fundamental value.

> But that argument also applies to the speed of light doesn't it? Can't measure how fast something is without a distance. That's sorta the point. Distance is determined by how fast light travels. You need a defined second and measure how far light travels in a fixed time.

> not some kind of fundamental value. This just makes the base/derived split weird though. The name implies (and it used to mean AFAIK) a unit that was fundamentally required to describe the universe. If its definition is in entirely terms of other units, that's not the case

Granted I also don't fully understand how the modern definition of the kg even works since it seems like it defines it in terms of the mass of a photon but photons have no mass so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It has energy so it's just E = mc2 I guess? Just glad it's above my pay grade to think about these things

Right, that's how you get to J = kg*m^2*s^-1, but photons have no mass so wtf I should have gone to college

All I'm saying is that we stopped using the mass of a litre of water because it was difficult to use in practice, and I'm not sure how determining the effects of a fixed numerical value for the Planck constant is somehow easier