Reason #18723 why I hate Actix and think the Rust community really should abandon ship on it and work on alternatives like warp, tower, gotham or rocket https://twitter.com/whitequark/status/1217945196400447488 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @mgattozzi
It's annoying because the community has gone way overboard with the "no unsafe ever" trend, and I want to be on the maintainer's side. But holy shit their reactions on the issue tracker are ridiculous
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
Yeah like a little unsafe here and there sure. Necessary stuff, but this maintainer is too dismissive. You'll also love to hear their commit for adding their own custom unsafe cell was merely: "add custom cell"
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @mgattozzi
What's frustrating with their style is they clearly don't understand what `unsafe` *means*. "There's no issue because public API doesn't exhibit UB" no that's besides the point. This function has unchecked invariants. Mark it as unsafe and move on
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @sgrif
It's really frustrating to see. I continue to think `unsafe` was the wrong term. It's about upholding a contract with the compiler.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mgattozzi
`mut` is more wrong than `unsafe` IMO. Either way they both get the point across well enough
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @sgrif @mgattozzi
saw that in the Oxide paper... I like https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.00982
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yes, it used to be the actual syntax a long time ago. The change to `mut` is referred to as the mutpocalypse
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.