![MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak [BEFORE! Jan/3➞₿🔑∎, LNP/BP]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1155014533720748032/DCY6N45O_normal.jpg)
Nope
Your programming language's standard library is still a dependency. It's just one you have much less control over than a third party library.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Agree, but the stability of a stdlib puts it in a different class of dependency? Not sure how useful this distinction is though, and definitely tangential to your point
-
That varies dramatically by language and by library. It might be true in many cases but I don't think it's a useful generalization.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I change you the python standard library and documentation for 100.000 npm modules
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everything is built on dependencies. The question is: how stable is the contract ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*whispers* Your operating system kernel is a dependency and usually dynamically linked.
-
your hardware is a dependency. lets go down to quantum physics ^^ ....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All package management is vendoring, /bin and /lib are just fancy ways of pronouncing "vendor".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Heh, I agree. Then we have people complaining about dependency count for no apparent reason. At least that's what I heard when I showed Rust to people. Speaking about Rust, despite having "minimal" std, I find many things that I would change there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.