Right, not saying they're her fault, just that whenever she's actually involved in the process of governing something has gone wrong. The causality is probably reversed: the only situations that call for her involvement are hairy ones anyway.
-
what would have happened in Canada if this law had not been passed and she passed away? Was there a fallback succession law? Or would it be a crisis since the only person able to approve changes to succession law was dead?
The previous law was passed to allow the queen to succeed Edward. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_Throne_Act_1937 … (That law just mirrors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Marriages_Act_1772 …) Prior to that it was outlined in the constitution IIRC. But at all points in time there have been rules for succession in place
-
-
ah aw, I like me a good legal contradiction (I was so excited when California temporarily catch-22d itself with a proposition that affected all propositions including itself)
-
I mean it's definitely amusing that the govt has repeatedly used this to assert its autonomy and independence from the UK, but then always passes laws mirroring the UK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.