I find this baffling coming from Ruby but it's just the norm in JS. God forbid one has a bug and you have to update a single package...https://twitter.com/sgrif/status/1138565864251244546 …
-
Yeah I don't understand what's causing the difference here. I disagree with people saying JS has a "lower barrier to entry" but maybe it's popularity? Maybe more similar libraries exist so one dev picks A, another picks B and we import both through dependent libraries?
JS absolutely does have a lower barrier to entry, but I don't believe there's a causation between that and an ecosystem of turning 3 line functions into standalone libraries
-
-
(I should have included an "In my opinion" there)
-
Opinion always implied on twitter, no worries! Tomorrow I'm checking our numbers because we definitely have more than 3 direct dependencies at work.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.