It's 130,000 signatures since TM spoke so that went well
-
-
-
point of order: you mean charts, or plots
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @pixeltrix
I'm going to repeatedly ask you the question "is this a graph" until someone rules that I can't any more.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
yes well I know about Rc now so knock yrself out
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
I've not got to these yet but this is for when a bunch of threads needs access to a mutex right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mountain_ghosts @pixeltrix
yup. Arc gives u send and Mutex gives u sync.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
given mutexes are precisely for synchronising threads, why do you need to wrap it in an Arc
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
(answer might be I don't know what Send and Sync do yet; though I think I partially know -- Send moves a value between threads, Sync shares it with synchronisation?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Neither "do" anything. They're what are called marker traits. Send means it's safe to send to another thread, Sync means it's safe to share. Sync doesn't perform any synchronization on it's own (and only implies it for types which allow mutability)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.