Ever wondered why Cargo selects the *newest* versions of crates? Or what that might have to do with putting compiler versions in Cargo.toml? Well I have just the blog post for you:
http://aturon.github.io/2018/07/25/cargo-version-selection/ …
Including Windows specific crates would be a much higher priority IMO. It's not that I'm worried that we aren't getting a sufficient sample, I just don't think we should pretend that it's more than exactly that: A sufficiently large sample
-
-
OK, I was concerned because you were talking about putting "too much trust" in a Crater run, but if you feel like it's by-and-large a sufficient sample (which I believe as well), then I think it's just a question of precise phrasing, which I don't care much about here.
-
I definitely don't think a crater run should be used as a justification for a breaking change, since not all Rust code is open source, and not all open source code is on http://crates.io . But for what it is trying to do, I think it's definitely a good sample
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.