I'm not supporting volatile qualifiers in boost.tmp. Even as a bare metal guy I support @johnregehr in deprecating volatile, its broken. volatile should not be an object property, it should be a property of an address (space). yeah I know the abstract machine has no notion of...
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @odinthenerd @johnregehr
I'm cool with not liking volatile. I don't like it either, and I'd love to get rid of volatile, too. But I also like my software free of bugs, and getting rid of volatile introduces bugs. Current C++ doesn't have any other way to get the desired semantics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This definitely feels like one of the cases that rust handled really well compared to C++
8:01 PM - 23 Jul 2018
from Durango, CO
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.