Who decides what is conducive to our spiritual and mental health? Will we maybe have 'aunts' who ensure we stay healthy so we're good breeding stock, appropriately spiritually nourished, educated in communal facilities before being sent out to fulfil our breeding potential?
-
-
Show this thread
-
Because we clearly can't be trusted with our freedom can we? We might do something daft that's bad for us, like get drunk, smoke, behave in a way that DAMAGES OUR SPIRITUAL WELLBEING. Best make sure we have only organic veg and springwater, exercise and daily scriptures.
Show this thread -
Anyway tt's 2021. "There is more than one kind of freedom, Freedom to and freedom from. In the days of anarchy, it was freedom to. Now you are being given freedom from. Don’t underrate it."
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Freedom...is not a good in itself." WTHF. How does anyone think this is a winning argument?
-
Yes, it's this concept that there can be a 'spiritual and mental wellbeing' that is somehow an objective quality that exists without the input of the individual who is supposedly being well. I mean I'd have better 'wellbeing' if I gave up eating crisps, but I LIKE crisps.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
In case you haven't already seen it, these are the musings of Dr Kathleen Stock, OBE.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hers is the kind of wellbeing that takes their apron off for a quick flick through No Idea then has a nice valium in a darkened room.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s interesting. If it’s axiomatic that men & women are essentially different, how can equality mean anything? Apples =/= oranges. It needs a deeper answer than one derived from pragmatism, or worse, one retrofitted from established praxis.
-
I don't know who decides what is the 'set of cultures of women' and what is a 'harmful gendered idea' because the implication seems to be that a)there is no crossover and b)there is no doubt.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
...and Kathleen Stock is trans-exclusionary, too. Because of course she is.
#evilIsBoring -
She sounds like an evangelical complementarian, if you're familiar with the various types of christian in the religious right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.