Seth D. Michaels in the 2020sOvjeren akaunt

@sethdmichaels

Voted People Magazine's Seth D-est man alive. He/him. Comms ; everything here is personal, not official. What if life is just some hard equation?

W A-S-H I-N-G T-O-N baby, DC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2008.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @sethdmichaels

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @sethdmichaels

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    (Sade voice) 🎶 small dog named Taters smaaalllll dog named Taters small dog named Taters smaaallllllllll dog named Taters 🎶 (sax solo)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 minuta
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  4. you know who's thinking about this stuff practically and effectively, with an eye toward not just this year but the future, is and

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Trump frames Alice Johnson's pardon as evidence of commitment to criminal justice reform for average Americans. But in reality, 3 yrs of Trump's pardons show: 1) almost all white men 2) almost all well-connected, via politics/celebrity 3) official applications get ignored

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. all of my electoral takes are gentle and lukewarm, like a cup of tea you've left sitting on your desk and finally remember to drink an hour later

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. the fortunate thing, re: both this and my previous thread, is that the never-X or Y-or-bust types are often very loud but also very few, and weird outliers

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. it's a good thread, and also why i think it's not especially useful or generally correct to describe these panicky centrist types as "would rather see Trump win than Bernie." i think it's a failure of imagination and a defensive crouch, not a secret preference (in most cases)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. this is a very good point, and as somebody kind of on the cusp between cohorts of DC folk, i see this play out a lot

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. the idea of some big huge realignment where you can safely ditch a lot of 2016 Dem voters and replace them with former Trump voters, whether you're imagining they come from a centrist-normalcy angle or a populist angle, is not realistic

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. which is to say, the successful Dem coalition of 2020 will be mostly - almost entirely - composed of 2016 Dem voters, and the way it gets bigger as it must is almost entirely by adding people who didn't vote, voted third party, or (especially!) weren't old enough in 2016

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. my perhaps controversial opinion is that, while Dems definitely have to win more votes in 2020 than they did in 2016, the amount of those additional votes coming from *2016 Trump voters* will be negligible

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Making it easier for industries to get away with killing birds...yet again the cruelty is the point.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The EPA is expected to sign off on four new chemicals in the PFAS family, even as concerns mount about their devastating health effects. via

    Poništi
  15. Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The ugly truth is that Trump is trying to keep nonwhite immigrants out, and a lot of Republicans love him for it

    Poništi
  17. in many ways, we live in the world Rush Limbaugh built; the bargain conservatives made with Trump is just a more consequential version of the one they made with Limbaugh nearly three decades ago. the damage he wrought will outlast him, considerably. condolences to his family.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 7 sati

    I'm up on how Democrats can force a vote on Trump's Medicaid block grant, so every vulnerable Republican in the Senate will have to take a position: for Trump's plan, or for saving millions from Medicaid cuts.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    All made possible because the Roberts Court willfully ignored the blatant racism of the first travel ban and pretended to believe there was "persuasive" evidence that it was about national security in Korematsu II

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    A note from the Republican Iowa Secretary of State about the repeated misinformation put out by Judicial Watch, a conservative organization that routinely spreads absolute garbage about voter rolls.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. in case you were wondering how my very normal brain is doing thanks to a normal and extremely healthy amount of being Online

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·