Senate JudiciaryVerified account

And yet the Dems ability to delay and obstruct worked well. We the people want judge Brett confirmed. Any woman who waits 35 years to come forward loses all credibility.

We the people = 38% YES (and dropping), 39% NO (and climbing), 23% undecided. And her years to come forward say nothing about credibility, only about pain. Get a clue.

Yet another blind liberal.What evidence does she have? None. Why didn’t she call the police? Because it never happened. What do the witnesses say? It never happened. What are women who knew Brett saying? That’s not the man they know. What is the Dems plan? Resist,Obstruct,Delay

23 of the 25 women roped in by the Repubs have recanted their support of Kavanaugh. They believe her. Why didn't she call the police? You obviously have never been a frightened, assaulted 15 year old who was nearly raped.

There were multiple credible allegations against Clarence Thomas in 1991. (Read Strange Justice) Yet @ChuckGrassley opened the #kavanugh hearings by denigrating those women. That doesn't bode well for the committee treating Ms. #ChristineFord w/ respect.https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1036994443088474113 …

This also shows that Grassley was well aware that there were some kind of sexual allegations against Kav. He was already preparing to ignore them.

What’s the rush? It appears @SenChuckGrassley is breaking all the rules in confirming #Kavanaugh as #SCOTUS Justice. Let’s slow down and do this right

If Democrats wanted to have a fair and adult evaluation of the accusations... why did they wait until the very end of the process to reveal this accusation, (which apparently has no objective evidence to support the claims)? Senator Feinstein has been sitting on this for months!

There IS objective evidence and Feinstein withheld the letter because Dr. Ford asked her to do so. At that time, Dr Ford said she didn't want to go public because she knew she'd be attacked and threatened and Sen Feinstein respected her wishes.

You alluded to objective evidence and then specifically mentioned exactly nothing.

Oh, sorry: Dr Ford told her husband and therapist about the attack in 2012. The therapist still has notes from that session that corroborate this.

Oh, you mean the extremely vague and inconsistent reported recollection of the very same subjective "source"? And how many years later? 30 years? Of course we don't really know, because the time and place are vague too. Hard to disprove something that is never specific, huh?

If @SenateDems & @SenFeinstein fail to cooperate and continue to obstruct in order to delay the vote, which is the purpose of this charade, then you have no choice but to let the vote go forward. To disrespect Judge #Kavanaugh w. this pathetic clown show is a disgrace @SenateGOP

Sir, Stay the course. Americans have your 6. Sir.

Not this American.