Since "no code" can be so confusing, does anyone have any ideas for what to call the category of creating software visually/declaratively without needing a text editor? Other terms that have baggage and are not ideal imo: wysiwygs, app builders, website builders...
-
-
Replying to @callmevlad @jackyalcine
I sorta like "no code" because you can pair it with "low code" and "pro code" to make a spectrum of builders, divided by how much code they get into. But maybe it's still too much focus on CODE rather than what they're trying to do.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
I've been thinking about Webflow's positioning a lot. It's the classic "bicycle for the mind": you could do all of this with code, but it's a lot faster this way, so why bother? But any formulation around the word "code" centers code in a way that's confusing or unhelpful.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
I think "development by direct manipulation" in a talk I saw Vlad give is a lot closer to the magic. Like a 3D editor lets you draw a model that is stored as code, Webflow lets you draw a website that becomes code, but the code isn't the interesting part, the tool is.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
WYSIWYG is the term for this but associated with bad underlying code. So: another term, ideally not so nerdy. A "visual web editor"?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
"Automated web development"? "Web development accelerator"? "Like that exo-skeleton Riley wears in Alien, except for building websites instead of lifting heavy things"?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Prototype accelerator?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Lotsa people building production sites with it!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



