Sarah Kreps

@sekreps

Prof | Nat sec, tech, & politics | Non-Res Senior Fellow | Former USAF officer | Cornell Tech Policy Lab

Ithaca, NY
government.cornell.edu/sarah-kreps
Joined August 2008
93 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @sekreps

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @sekreps

  1. Pinned Tweet
    20 Jul 2020

    My new book, Social Media and International Relations, is now available through . It’s free to download for the next two weeks! Some of the themes of the book (w/ shameless self-promotion of my other work & cites to excellent work of others).

    31 replies 212 retweets 626 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    Dec 2

    . is recruiting for several important new roles - please check out the links in this thread, help us spread the word, and apply to join us!

    3 replies 47 retweets 60 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    Nov 30

    Check out this new paper from my colleague 👇 Democratizing harm: Artificial intelligence in the hands of nonstate actors Thrilled to have this work part of the Global Forum on Democracy and Tech

    7 retweets 13 likes
    Undo
  4. Oct 13

    Looking forward to this!

    Is our social media addiction generating new national security vulnerabilities? Come find out tomorrow at 12, when we host for a discussion at the intersection of digital markets and national security. RSVP here.
    2 retweets 15 likes
    Undo
  5. Oct 1

    Join us!

    An panel I'm chairing today on "(Mis)Information in Great Power Competition and Democratic Governance" with papers from & has moved online! DM me for the Zoom link.
    6 likes
    Undo
  6. Sep 22

    This piece is an intellectual tour de force, weaving in insights about war powers, bureaucratic politics, & current history. I assign it in my Separation of Powers class & am fortunate to be including it in my forthcoming volume. Thanks for the contribution, Rebecca.

    This Tweet is unavailable.
    3 retweets 10 likes
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Sep 21

    The politics of drone strikes and why it's unlikely that much will change after the tragedy in Afghanistan, from & in

    3 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Sep 14

    This Friday, 9/17, the Tech/Law Colloquium welcomes Sarah Kreps (), of Cornell, who presents "AI-Mediated Communication, Legislative Responsiveness, and Trust in Democratic Institutions." Join us virtually. 💻 📱 Talk/Zoom details

    3 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Aug 24

    Starting now: The final session of the Workshop on . Join , , , , , , , and others as they discuss these models’ societal consequences.

    3 replies 4 retweets 17 likes
    Undo
  10. Aug 24

    Looking forward to day 2 of the workshop, especially the panel where we'll be discussing uses and misuses of these models. 1:15pm PT/4:15pm ET, livestreamed here:

    Starting in 1 hour: The two-day workshop on will bring together scholars and experts from a vast array of disciplines to discuss foundation models (eg GPT-3), the underlying technology, and the broader societal impact. Streaming live here
    Show this thread
    3 retweets 8 likes
    Undo
  11. Aug 16

    Harder to outflank Republican on hawkishness...political cost of foreign policy debacles may be lower bc fewer credible alternatives. But curious what and think, since we've co-authored on adjacent ideas.

    1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Aug 16

    Better historical analogy might be the fall of the Shah in 1979, which clearly implicated Carter in the "who lost Iran?" debates that followed and weakened him going into the 1980 election.

    2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Aug 16

    One thing to consider is that the political liability for a Democrat may be higher than for a Republican bc it reinforces the dovish, "lead from behind on national security" narrative associated w/ Democrats.

    One minor note on the fall of Saigon: whatever embarrassment it may have meant for the United States or the Ford administration, it's not really my recollection that it hurt Ford politically or was an important issue in the 1976 campaign
    Show this thread
    1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Jul 21

    ...the U.S. should continue to target the unvaccinated populations within its own country but work to increase access of its vaccines to these countries that want the vaccine, will benefit from the vaccine, and will ultimately impact the public health situation here at home."

    1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Jul 21

    "Each of these countries represents both a potential outbreak and opportunity for the virus to mutate into more deadly variants that will invariably become global, which the Delta variant has shown to be the case.. .

    1 reply 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Jul 21

    One big takeaway of the research vis-a-vis the Delta variant (written up here in the : ) is that...

    1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Jul 21

    Thanks especially to my collaborators on the US study, , , and , and to for funding that part of the research.

    1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Jul 21

    Recent research in shows receptiveness to COVID-19 vaccines in lower income countries. Incredible intellectual energy and effort of collaborators across universities/continents.

    Our new paper in Nature Medicine on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance & hesitancy in 10 low & middle income countries plus Russia and the United States, comprising a total of 44,260 individuals. Wonderful to collaborate , his team and others (authors 👇) 🧵on main findings
    Show this thread
    1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Jul 16

    I'm so happy to finally see this paper published in ! It's incredible that such a large team all around the world came together to complete this project. , , and I performed the US part of the study. Thank you for funding us!

    Our new paper in Nature Medicine on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance & hesitancy in 10 low & middle income countries plus Russia and the United States, comprising a total of 44,260 individuals. Wonderful to collaborate , his team and others (authors 👇) 🧵on main findings
    Show this thread
    3 replies 10 retweets 39 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    May 6

    behavioral health experts + bioethicists weigh in: does free sh*t make people want to get vaccinated?

    1 reply 4 retweets 9 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Apr 30

    Here's the article referenced, published with , Jill Goldfarb, and Doug Kriner:

    4 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo

@sekreps hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·