If you have a dependency that exposes binaries with @npmjs then removing that dep is a semver major since it's breaking as npm puts... [1/2]
sure, for the transitive dep but my point is that transitive dep binaries are now a part of your own libraries API contract
-
-
Calling some transitive dep's binaries is like requiring some transitive dep. You _can_ do it, but you get to keep the pieces.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't go trawling through node_modules/.bin for things to run. I get them from docs of things I required. I dunno about you. =D
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It probably would be worth having a linter for this kind of though though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All this said, I'm not opposed to the idea of giving each module its own set of node_modules/.bin links, for clarity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 