he/him 
Surprised to find that the existence of Error.prototype.stack isn't in the ecma262 spec. Format makes sense but non existence surprises me.
@sebmck So I guess if you use Error.prototype.stack then you're using non-standard JavaScript?
-
-
@sebmck In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell -
@sebmck nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means comfort - 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck no such thing as standard JavaScript -
@davidlymanning yes there is - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck but yes. it's non-standard and IIRC has a few differences across browsers which makes it hard to write reliable error handling code -
@tbreisacher super weird. i expected the stack property to be specified like function toString where up to implementation, at least defined.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck hehe it would be pretty tough to write truly 100% standards-compliant JS. not sure it's a worthy goal for most projects.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.