SebastianVerified account

@iamdustan @dan_abramov no, it completely goes against the idea of presets and brings us back to terrible babel 5 transformer toggles

@sebmck @iamdustan What is a good way to tweak some options for my lib? Is publishing my own preset on NPM the only way?

@sebmck @iamdustan e.g. I want everything from es-2015 but loose, and I want to change commonjs to be strict

@dan_abramov @sebmck This would be cool option for options: presets: { 'es2015': { loose: true }, 'react': {} }

@timdorr @dan_abramov preset options have been suggested but then people will just abuse them

@sebmck @dan_abramov Abuse in what way? Seems like abuse in modify-babel-preset is more dangerous :S

@timdorr @dan_abramov presets are fundamentally a flat list of options, adding in dynamism contradicts that

@timdorr @dan_abramov i feel bad about this but we will break this pattern if it becomes common. it is harmful. https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/3306 …