@lbljeffmo @sebmck @jumbleofideas @mikeal forward to what? Nothing is gained.
@lbljeffmo you can't compromise es modules because then node will be deviating from the spec and nobody wants that
-
-
@sebmck@lbljeffmo which spec. -
@bradleymeck@lbljeffmo the ecmascript one - 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck I see at least 1 or 2 viable paths forward that don't compromise ES modules or any existing CJS modules -
@sebmck it compromises some interop cases -- but not any existing CJS, not any newly minted ES going - 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@lbljeffmo node are definently not going to accept crippling commonjs modules either.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 