SebastianVerified account

@fishrock123 @rvagg btw i don't really want to have this discussion if there's just going to be dismissal

@sebmck Apologies, it gets incredibly frustrating when a platform is handed stuff and expected to implement it, conflicting or not.

@sebmck There’s a a forward motion of filling ECMA with everything possible. 1) because that’s effectively what TC39 exists for now (..)

@sebmck (..) 2) because browsers are terrible at effectively sharing user code, so to decrease load times, it is “required”.

@fishrock123 are you talking about modules?

@sebmck I’m not talking about any one thing.

@fishrock123 oh right, about the inclusion of things in the language to reduce load bloat. not everything is polyfillable, not even syntax.

@sebmck I don’t disagree, but at least focus on making it good then? Take V8 promises. (..)