SebastianVerified account

@amasad OTOH increased chance that unintended breaking change will be reported (because more users) and next patch will fix it for everybody

@dan_abramov that's true, but is there a way to do this more responsibly? Have it be opt-in rather than the default?

@amasad I'd say people who care about stability use shrinkwrap anyway

@dan_abramov yeah maybe that's true, although they might be a minority given how many people get affected by babel's breaking bug fixes

@amasad why doesn't Babel just bump majors more often? @dan_abramov

@lbljeffmo @amasad @dan_abramov we will probably have to in the future. just need to get the infra in place to do it.

@lbljeffmo @amasad @dan_abramov the problem is we have so many integrations that people use. keeping them on old versions isn't good.

@lbljeffmo @amasad @dan_abramov there's also projects who directly expose babel and depend on it like systemjs/electron/atom.