SebastianVerified account

@BrendanEich I'm prob missing your point, but 'async=>foo' is already ES6 -- so couldn't start req'ing parens.. @cpojer @bterlson @sebmck

@lbljeffmo @BrendanEich @cpojer @bterlson @sebmck I suppose @BrendanEich means require () for async funcs, so that they can't be headless.

@lbljeffmo @BrendanEich @cpojer @bterlson @sebmck Basically async=>foo vs async ()=>foo.

@RReverser @BrendanEich oh right, I think I was taking that for granted @cpojer @bterlson @sebmck

@lbljeffmo @rreverser @brendaneich @cpojer @bterlson Could alternatively restrict async from being a param name although probably too late.

@sebmck @lbljeffmo @brendaneich @cpojer @bterlson Totally too late (and I believe it would confuse even more as it's not even a keyword).

@rreverser @lbljeffmo @brendaneich @cpojer @bterlson How is it too late? The web isn't relying on it.

@rreverser @lbljeffmo @brendaneich @cpojer @bterlson Ive heard this before. Most people are compiling their code. Major bump for those tools