he/him 
.@babeljs 6 is going to consist of well over a 100 separate packages. Taking modularity too far? Nope, not far enough.
-
@natebirdman nah it's all in the same repo and there's a bootstrap script to link them all.
.@natebirdman I think it's a common misconception that multiple modules === multiple repos.
-
-
@natebirdman But yeah, hopefully more collaborators come on board to own specific modules. Devs just need to be aware of the public API -
@natebirdman without having to know how the rest of the Babel pipeline works. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck you said "packages", not "modules".@natebirdman -
@mjackson@natebirdman what's the difference - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck The useful part of having multiple repos, though, is that you can easily delegate privileges to maintainers for individual modules -
@Keithamus set npm privileges
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@sebmck@natebirdman so they'll all exist in a single repo? Or you'll just have a single package that links them together? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.