http://babeljs.io/repl/#?experimental=true&evaluate=true&loose=false&spec=false&playground=false&code=class%20C%20%7B%7D%0A%0Aclass%20B%20extends%20C%20%7B%0A%20%20constructor(foo)%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20foo()%3B%0A%20%20%20%20super()%3B%0A%20%20%7D%0A%7D%0A%0Aclass%20A%20extends%20B%20%7B%0A%20%20constructor()%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20super(()%20%3D%3E%20this.foo)%3B%0A%20%20%7D%0A%7D%0A … why is this ok in ES2015? cc @sebmck @lbljeffmo
-
-
@sebmck@lbljeffmo@RReverser figured it was missing runtime checks. Definitely worth having -
@sebmck@lbljeffmo@RReverser otherwise it might be a world of pain once we stop transpiling class. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 