@rem I don't think so
-
-
-
Replying to @jaffathecake
@rem http://jsbin.com/hahihu/edit?js,console … - <script> is like test 1, require() is like test 2.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@rem In that case, the most usual use-case for require() (require everything on init) will be handled without blocking.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RReverser
@RReverser@rem right, but require() isn't limited to that the same way ES6 imports are1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@rem Sure - but the cases where require is in the middle of internal statements will remain the only blocking ones (rare).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RReverser
@RReverser@jaffathecake@rem I wonder if we could make require arbitrary blocking via generators. `let lib = yield require('lib');` or smth1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WebReflection
@WebReflection@RReverser@rem is this just: var require = System.import.bind(System);1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@RReverser@rem uhm ... dunno, if that's it, I'm a happy person ... but I don't think that does what I think it does :D1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WebReflection
@WebReflection@RReverser@rem I'm not entirely familiar with the API, so it's likely that I'm misunderstanding it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jaffathecake @webreflection @rreverser @rem Loader spec is still in flux. System.import("filename") returns a promise tho so still async.
-
-
Replying to @sebmck0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 