@raganwald yeah the lack of lexical name (recursion, event binding/unbinding, etc) hampers both => and concise methods. :/
-
-
Replying to @getify
@getify@raganwald Babel adds lexical names to concise methods. Is this a bug?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sverrejoh
@sverrejoh@raganwald yes, it is a babel inconsistency with spec. +@sebmck@thejameskyle1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jamiebuilds
@thejameskyle@sverrejoh@raganwald@sebmck concise methods do get http://function.name inference, but do NOT get lexical name.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @getify
@getify@thejameskyle@sverrejoh@raganwald@sebmck That's why any references to it are proxied out so it's transparent for your code.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RReverser
@RReverser@getify@thejameskyle@sverrejoh@sebmck That reminds me: https://github.com/babel/babel/issues/896 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jamiebuilds
@thejameskyle@raganwald@getify@sverrejoh@sebmck Well, it's actually correct, and issue was already fixed. Maybe regression.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@thejameskyle @rreverser @raganwald @getify @sverrejoh Fixed, thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 