he/him 
Although maybe PHP is better. 99% of the time all I want is <?php include 'other-file'; ?>
Show this thread
Jeykll so far has been my favourite static site generator. Nothing for me has ever come close to being as easy to use. Everything else, including all the React solutions, are very intimidating.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Consensus seems to be to use
@eleven_ty, which despite the name, is meant to be quite goodShow this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
100% agree. and with netlify you get the build visibility in case you want a custom plugin or whatever.
-
Curious if either of you have tried
@eleven_ty in comparison? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I spent so much time fighting Jekyll in the context of GitHub Pages that it soured me on ever trying it outside of that.
-
That's actually how I grew to like it! There weren't many solutions at the time where you could just push to a repo and not have to worry about builds.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You should revisit NextJS. They recently added a few new data fetching APIs meant for static sites and they made it very easy for me to make my blog completely static. (But you also have the flexibility of SSR!)
-
I don’t want to write JavaScript
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
After years of using Jekyll, switched to
@eleven_ty recently for a few projects and would not turn back. Has been a nice balance of fast build times, extensibility and WebPerf. -
I've just switch to Hugo and loving it, the caveat there is I've been working mostly in golang these days.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.