he/him 
It’s cool that there’s bots and stuff that do this but it really shouldn’t be necessary
Show this thread
GitHub needs a "merge once checks have passed" option that you can select on specific PRs
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I built this with webhooks at work and it is one of the the biggest quality of life improvements I have ever madehttps://gist.github.com/sophiebits-humu/d38ec7508f89338e7ac45cb0f33f9217 …
-
New conversation -
-
-
FWIW Refined Github extension currently does this: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1402241/35192861-3f4a1bf6-fecc-11e7-8b9f-35ee019c6cdf.gif …
-
how can it do that without server support?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
gitlab does this and it is probably my favorite feature now that I work somewhere that went GL over GH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Azure devops does that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GitHub Actions? Listen to CheckRunEvent and merge if checkrun.conclusion is successful, it can probably cleanup and delete the branch toohttps://developer.github.com/v3/activity/events/types/#checkrunevent …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've been using Kodiak bot for this and it works great but it really should be a feature native to
@github. It's such a fundamental part of code review. We got auto-delete branch on merge so maybe we'll auto-merge on passing checks soon. cc@natfriedman
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This exists in Azure DevOps so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s on the roadmap for GH too
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.