I am all for many small single purpose diffs. But the reality is that sometimes it prevents a codebase expert from going on a rampage of improvements and features. Small well organized diffs are better but are they better than the changes not happening at all?
-
-
I think that determines whether or not to follow the hyper incremental approach. Who and how many are working on it with you, how much do they know relative to you, how important is it to transfer that knowledge at this point in the project lifecycle?
-
And what is the cost of accidentally breaking something
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 