I haven't posted anything about Rome in a while so here is what I worked on this evening. These are more error messages. It's obviously not all I'm working on but it's the easiest thing to tweet and discuss.
Not really. You queue up errors, always recovering from them by normalizing input etc. Then you have a boundary where you either dump the errors and stop, or write the normalized values somewhere when there's a --fix flag. Easily abstracted.
-
-
No, I get that. My question was more around the multitude of possible errors. I imagine there's a separate module for every single test, so how will maintainers know that the validator they want to add exists already? Documentation discipline? Kinda reminds me of ESLint rules.
-
The validation and normalization is the same code. I don't really understand the question. There isnt some special set of validators.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 