SebastianVerified account

Ken is complaining he is being attacked purely for someone accusing him of being white supremacist. I pointed out that people are always complaining about OTHER problematic behaviour. Dismiss the white supremacy shit, because he is not, but do not dismiss the rest.

How can you even unilerately say that with incomplete information

As “offensiveness” is determined by whether anyone takes offense, it is impossible to say without asking literally everyone. But we can imagine a “reasonable person” in everyone’s stead. Perhaps this exercise illustrates the absurdity of the offense-taking olympics. 1/n

Honest questions: are there reasonable claims of comments or behavior that materially disenfranchise marginalized groups (to take a common criterion for “problematic”)? Furthermore, is said behavior intentional, and if so, is it reasonable to limit in a free society?

Re claims of comments or behaviour see:https://twitter.com/sebmck/status/1165485977109815297 …

How is my argument stupid? You're saying "the current events in motion" are entirely from the white supremacy accusations. They are not. It was the instigator but there is a wider sentiment regarding numerous of Ken's past and present behaviour.