JavaScript boy and “lovely thoughtleader” 
he/him 
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Sometimes tools are too flexible. Configuration options that only exist to support every single possible use case. For example, being able to customize the folder name for a tests. Many small customizations that compound in an unnecessarily complex tool.
Most of the time it's a desire to please and there's a hesitance to tell users: "if you want to use this tool then conform to its standards and conventions".
Tell me more.
Depends on the extremes that you want to debate. I don't think every single config option is unnecessary but should be weighted against the ability for the tool to innovate and the actual usefulness. Some options can be predicted to actively prevent certain architectural changes.
Sometimes also to help people migrate from other tools
Conforming to standard conventions should be the first start of a migration
"You can please some of the people some of the time..." "Focusing is about saying no..."
I think that's basically right, but you can get away with allowing more configuration along these lines through layering: if people want to change something, they go to the more flexible layer underneath.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
