/s ?
-
-
Replying to @cpojer
Oh wow, really? I honestly didn't know this. I thought Yarn still accounted for a pretty small amount of package downloads.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cpojer @MelloGarrett
nah, man. Y'all are dropping down to like 30%. You didn't really eat the CLI up, you just blipped us for a while. Try and be a bit more realistic ;)
1 reply 4 retweets 65 likes -
Replying to @zkat__ @maybekatz and
He knew that is not 50% anymore already. But chose to forget the factpic.twitter.com/VZBfXixbr3
2 replies 4 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @dcorbacho @maybekatz and
Sebastian Retweeted Laurie Voss
Laurie himself admitted he wasn't confident in the numbers and would verify. He never did.https://twitter.com/seldo/status/1108809073896669184?s=09 …
Sebastian added,
Laurie Voss @seldoReplying to @seldo @cpojer and 3 othersOur ability to measure this stuff has been thoroughly broken for a while as a result of our growth outpacing the method I previously used to measure this stuff (it has been a similarly long time since I measured versions of npm and node in use, for the same reason). Sorry!1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @sebmck @dcorbacho and
I shared it privately with
@cpojer a month ago. Here it is:pic.twitter.com/rfz7P9GP35
2 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @seldo @dcorbacho and
Nice! I hadn't seen that before. Is there anything being done to give us back Cloudflare access to our domain? Should we be looking into our own way of collecting these stats?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Also I wonder if Yarn PnP + offline mirror is making cache usage more effective, which would result in decreased network traffic.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
Neither of those features, especially PnP, have enough mainstream use to explain any decrease
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
he/him 