he/him 
As a hiring manager, I never factored "cost of living" into offers: - It's inaccurate af. - It's wrong to reward/punish because of geo. - The value of the position doesn't change with geo. - People stay when treated fairly.
-
*cries in capitalism*
Check out https://fb.workplace.com/groups/compensation.discussion/permalink/1831210510240827/ … if you want to cry more 
(a post about my salary difference from LON -> MPK)
-
-
-
My exp ~4 years ago: $55k in Germany $120k when I relocated to SF (same company)
I did the 1/3 math (single guy)
1/3 rent
1/3 food+entertainment
1/3 savings
and it is all proportional except that obviously I will never save as much in EU (good for when you move back) - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yup. I have indeed read this, and that’s why I’m comfortable claiming what I do now. I’d only vaguely believed it till I read it. (which fkin sucks, because I love London and never want to leave. Feels bad-ish.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First thoughts are it is supply and demand economics but peer parity always needs to be considered. Geo differences in tech salary are huge though. UK rates seem very low even compared with Australia. How would paying SF rates in London work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.